| |
Satellite microwave radiances
|
|
| |
| |
| Advantages of microwave wavelengths for
atmospheric sounding |
|
| |
| The microwave spectrum is the region
where the wavelength of light is a few millemetres, compared to
micrometres in the infrared and hundreds of nanometres in the visible.
These long wavelengths have one key advantage over the shorter wavelengths:
clouds are semi-transparent. For wavelengths in excess of 3 cm clouds
are almost completely transparent, but unfortunately there are no
useful spectral lines between 3 and 10 cm wavelength to allow atmospheric
sounding, and as wavelength increases so does the size of antenna
required on the spacecraft to obtain high-resolution images. Cloud
opacity increases with decreasing wavelength below 3 cm. The first
spectral band which can be used for temperature sounding is reached
at approximately 5 mm, a complex band of oxygen spectral lines.
At this wavelength the effect of ice cloud can still be largely
ignored, with the exception of very deep cumulonimbus clouds. However,
the effects of water drops can not be ignored. Nonetheless the
situation is far better than in the infrared, where any cloud, no
matter how thin or high, makes the data difficult and in many cases
impossible to exploit. |
| |
| Use of microwave sounding data at the Met
Office |
|
| |
|
The ATOVS series of instruments carries a
20-channel microwave sounder which exploits the 5 mm oxygen band
for temperature, and also water vapour lines at 12 mm and 1.6
mm. When we refer to a channel we mean the measurement of the
electromagnetic spectrum in a narrow wavelength region. By measuring
where oxygen absorption is strong we are sensitive to the upper-atmospheric
temperature. By measuring where it is weak we are sensitive to
lower atmospheric temperature. By measuring in a number of discrete
wavelength bands, or channels, we gain information on the vertical
profile of temperature. The same technique can be applied to measuring
water vapour, and indeed other atmospheric constituents such as
ozone, carbon dioxide, CFCs etc. The 20 channel microwave instrument
we use is known as the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU),
and was first launched in 1998 and used operationally as a key
component of the global observing system just 8 months later.
It is "Advanced" with respect to its predecessor which measured
only 4 channels, all close to the 5 mm oxygen band.
In the early days of atmospheric sounding, the radiance measurements
were processed to produce an estimate of the atmospheric temperature
profile. This is known as a retrieval (of temperature). These
retrievals were then used as if they were temperature profile
measurements made by instruments carried by balloons (radiosondes).
However this was far from the best way to use the data. The measurements
are very different. The satellite data measures radiance. These
radiances are sensitive to the atmospheric temperature in deep
layers. Typically the fields of view are 50 km wide, and a single
radiance measurement can be affected by temperature variations
over depths of 3-5 km, and thus can not uniquely resolve features
which are thinner vertically than this depth. By contrast radiosondes
can resolve very fine structure in the vertical, but are measuring
the temperature of a very small sample of air, which may not necessarily
be representative of a wider area. Both are accurate measurements
but if the data is used in way which does not take into account
what was actually measured in each case then some, and perhaps
even most, of the information in the measurement can be lost.
So the differences between different types of measurement need
to be recognised in the way the data is used, because both have
strengths and weaknesses. A method has been developed known as
direct radiance assimilation, whereby we compare the radiance
measurement with what we would have expected to measure, given
everything we already know about the atmosphere. Our knowledge
of the atmospheric state is then updated only where the two disagree,
and only on the scales which the satellite measurement can actually
resolve. This approach has very significantly increased the value
of satellite data to weather forecasting.
|
| |
| Impact of microwave sounding data |
|
| |
| We regularly measure the impact of the
microwave sounding data on the accuracy of our weather forecasts.
As would be expected satellite data has the largest impact where
there are few other observations. Forecast errors would be doubled
in the southern hemisphere for example if satellite radiances were
unavailable. However, in recent years the importance of satellite
data in regions where other data are available has increased. This
is to be expected given the differences in the type of information
provided by satellite radiances and other observations is now recognised
in the way we use the data. It is now found that the satellite data
has an impact comparable or even larger than the radiosondes even
in the northern hemisphere, where other observations are often in
plentiful supply (although even the northern hemisphere has data
voids, especially over the oceans). |
| |
| Research activities in assimilation of microwave
radiances |
|
| |
|
Precipitation
assimilation
Improved radiative
transfer models
More on
SSM/I
More on
ATOVS
The International
ATOVS Working Group (ITWG)
In addition research is active in using new satellite data types
(e.g. SSMIS,
Windsat
- follow the links for more information), improving use of satellite
data over land (which is complicated by the variability of the
surface - its characteristics, temperature and altitude) and using
data in high-resolution models (the use of satellite data is more
developed in global low-resolution models than regional high-resolution
models).
|
| |
| Daily ATOVS and SSM/I monitoring |
|
| |
|
ATOVS and SSM/I data are routinely monitored and the results are
updated daily.
ATOVS
and SSM/I data coverage plots SSM/I
monitoring statistics ATOVS
monitoring statistics
|
|
|
|